The article discusses the pressing challenges and strategies surrounding climate change adaptation in India, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to climate risk management. Key points include:

• Rising Climate Threats: India faces significant climate challenges as evidenced by rising temperatures, erratic monsoons, and intensifying disasters, with over 80% of the population living in areas at risk of climate-induced calamities.

• Systemic Risks: Extreme weather events like floods and heatwaves threaten economic stability, public health, and national security. The country's adaptive capacity is hindered by gaps in risk assessment frameworks that lead to reactive rather than proactive strategies.

• Understanding Climate Physical Risks (CPRs): CPRs concern both acute climatic shocks (e.g., floods) and chronic stresses (e.g., shifting monsoon patterns). They necessitate a long-term planning approach, contrasting with short-term weather forecasts.

• Mitigation vs. Adaptation Funding: While global funding disproportionately favors mitigation efforts (like renewable energy and decarbonization), investing in adaptation strategies is economically beneficial. The UN Environment Programme suggests that every dollar spent on adaptation can yield a fourfold return.

• Framework for Climate Risk: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change outlines that the expected value of CPR relates to hazard, exposure, and vulnerability, guiding understanding of climate risk.

• Regulatory Shifts: There's a global shift towards mandatory climate risk disclosures, with India’s Reserve Bank incorporating climate risks into its regulatory framework. This emphasizes that understanding climate risks is essential for business continuity.

• Fragmented Assessment Approach in India: India’s climate risk assessment efforts are disjointed, with various government and research institutions using different methodologies. This fragmentation complicates reliable projections and informed decision-making.

• Challenges with Global Models: Current global climate models are inadequate for capturing India’s unique climate impacts, stressing the need for localized data.

• Steps Towards a Comprehensive Strategy: India is working on its National Adaptation Plan through the Adaptation Communication, aimed at aligning with the Paris Agreement. Efforts are underway to enhance the NAP, but a more structured tool for climate risk assessment is necessary.

• Call for a Specific Tool: The article emphasizes the need for a robust India-centric climate risk assessment tool that consolidates local climate data, supports decision-making for both public and private sectors, and integrates adaptive strategies into long-term planning.

• Vision for Viksit Bharat: As India progresses towards "Viksit Bharat" (Developed India), emphasis on thorough climate assessments is crucial to ensure sustainable and resilient future development.

In summary, India's climate future requires immediate attention to building robust adaptation strategies, which necessitates an organized and proactive approach to managing climate risks. Without a unified and comprehensive framework, the country risks exacerbating its vulnerabilities, making the establishment of a dedicated climate risk assessment tool imperative for future resiliency.

The Olive Ridley turtle, classified as a vulnerable species, gained attention earlier this year due to a record number of seventy thousand turtles nesting at Rushikulya beach in Odisha, India. This phenomenon, known as “arribada,” raised concerns for conservationists about the implications of human interventions on these sea turtles’ behavior and future.

Summary:

• Record Nesting Event: In March, a remarkable seven lakh (700,000) Olive Ridley turtles nested at Rushikulya beach in Odisha.
• Arribada Phenomenon: This mass nesting event, referred to as “arribada” (Spanish for “arrival”), highlights both joy and concern about the turtles’ future amid human impact.
• Population Decline: Despite localized population increases, the global population of Olive Ridleys has decreased by 30-50% since 1960, according to the IUCN Red List.
• Nesting Sites: Olive Ridley turtles primarily nest along the Pacific coasts of Mexico and Central America, with significant sites also in Odisha. The state's coastline has three major nesting beaches: Gahirmatha, Devi, and Rushikulya.
• Philopatry: The turtles exhibit a behavior called philopatry, where they return to their natal nesting sites after decades, guided by local magnetic fields.
• Ecological Factors: Other factors influencing nesting site selection include salinity, land slope, predation risk, rainfall, and proximity to nutrient-rich cold-core eddies.
• Competition for Nesting Sites: Increased turtle populations may lead to overcrowding at nesting sites, with turtles potentially disturbing existing nests, leading to broken eggs and attracting predators.
• Impact of Rising Temperatures: Temperature affects the sex of hatchlings, with higher temperatures resulting in more female hatchlings, further reinforcing nesting at warmer beaches.
• Genetic Concerns: Conservation efforts like artificial egg incubation may inadvertently decrease genetic resilience by allowing weaker individuals to survive and reproduce.
• Community Involvement: Local communities play a crucial role in conservation, helping protect nests and curb poaching. However, excessive tourism related to turtle nesting can stress these animals.
• Tourism Challenges: Increased turtle tourism can lead to disturbances, including unnecessary human interaction, which may disrupt nesting behavior and affect the turtles’ long-term nesting fidelity.
• Ethical Responsibility: The focus of conservation efforts must shift from merely increasing numbers to ensuring the ecological integrity of nesting sites, emphasizing a balance between tourism and environmental safeguarding.

Key Points:

• Olive Ridley turtles have shown resilience through historical challenges but are facing new threats, particularly from human interactions and climate change.
• Their nesting behaviors and future populations are intimately linked to ecological health and human ethical responsibilities.
• Conservation practices should adapt to consider not only population growth but the long-term sustainability of nesting traditions and beaches.

Ultimately, as human influence grows, the responsibility to maintain the ecological balance for the Olive Ridley turtles and their habitats becomes increasingly urgent.

The news article discusses the implications of recent Supreme Court rulings on environmental clearances in India, highlighting concerns about the government's approach to balancing development and environmental sustainability. The backdrop to these rulings is the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Rules of 2006, which were intended to protect ecosystems and public health. However, changes made to these rules over the years have been criticized for undermining their effectiveness.

Key points from the article are as follows:

• Purpose of Environmental Clearances: Environmental clearances are designed to ensure developmental projects do not harm ecosystems, wildlife, or public health, maintaining a balance between development and sustainability.

• EIA Rules of 2006: These rules were established to facilitate responsible policymaking in development, necessitating assessments of environmental impact before project approval.

• Post-Facto Clearances Initiated: In 2017, an amendment allowed projects to begin without prior environmental clearance, creating a system where developers could obtain retroactive approvals.

• 2021 Memorandum: An Office Memorandum issued in 2021 targeted handling violations related to environmental clearances, further consolidating the regime of post-facto clearances.

• Supreme Court Interventions: The Supreme Court has intervened multiple times, notably striking down the 2017 notification and the 2021 OM on May 16, asserting that the government has been protective of those violating environmental laws, thereby jeopardizing public health and ecosystems.

• Historical Context of Court Rulings: Previous Supreme Court cases have criticized the government for neglecting environmental regulations, highlighting serious lapses in granting clearances for large-scale mining and industrial activities.

• Impact of Regulatory Laxity: An analysis indicated that the relaxation of EIA regulations since 2017 allowed over 50 projects, including several polluting industries, to proceed without proper environmental scrutiny.

• Right to a Healthy Environment: The Supreme Court has expanded the scope of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution to encompass the right to a healthy environment, linking this right to the urgent need for regulatory diligence.

• Government's View on Sustainability: The article criticizes the common governmental tendency to treat sustainability and development as opposing forces, often prioritizing ease of business over environmental protection.

• Message to Policymakers: The Supreme Court emphasizes that environmental conservation is integral to the concept of development, urging policymakers to reconsider their approach to regulatory processes.

Overall, the article underscores a critical reflection on the balance between development and environmental protection, reinforcing the need for strict adherence to EIA protocols and greater responsibility from policymakers to safeguard public and ecological health.

The article discusses the increasing global interest in a "modal shift" from road and air transport to railways for both passengers and freight. This transition is driven by the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as transportation accounts for nearly a quarter of the world’s energy-related carbon emissions. Rail travel is significantly cleaner, producing fewer carbon emissions per passenger-kilometer compared to buses, planes, and cars. However, the use of rail for both freight and passenger transport is declining worldwide, particularly as road transport grows rapidly, especially in emerging economies like India and China.

Key points from the article include:

• A "modal shift" indicates the movement of transportation modes from roads and flights to railways, emphasizing reducing environmental impacts.
• Cars, buses, and trucks are major contributors to CO2 emissions. Road transport produces significantly higher emissions compared to railways, with trains emitting about 19 grams of CO2 per passenger/kilometer.
• Between 2007 and 2021, the global rail share of freight transport dropped from 51% to 40%, and for passenger transport from 12% to 8%, largely due to the rapid expansion of road networks.
• In lower-income countries, a continuation of current trends could result in a 16% rise in greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector.
• Conversely, encouraging a shift to rail could prevent up to 1.8 billion tons of carbon emissions by 2050.
• The European Union is pioneering initiatives to move 30% of road freight to rail by 2030 and over 50% by 2050.
• China has made strides in shifting freight to rail, contributing to reduced road traffic and a cleaner environment.
• In India, despite having a vast railway network, road transport grows due to improved infrastructure.
• The Indian government's National Rail Plan aims for a 45% freight modal share for rail by 2030, along with plans to improve passenger rail use.
• Urban metro systems in cities like Delhi and Mumbai are facilitating modal shifts; the Delhi Metro has significantly reduced the number of vehicles on the road and lowered CO2 emissions.
• With India being a leading greenhouse gas emitter, the government aims for net-zero emissions by 2070, requiring substantial reductions in transport sector emissions.
• India has the potential to generate carbon credits through reduced emissions from increased rail usage, which could be sold to fund green projects.
• However, careful planning is necessary to align local benefits with international objectives, ensuring compliance with stringent regulations on carbon credits.
• A transition to electric trains requires a shift to renewable energy sources to enhance the sustainability of transportation.
• Ultimately, the mode shift from roads to rails is portrayed not just as a logistical change but as a crucial step toward building a cleaner, safer, and more sustainable future for India and setting an example globally.

In conclusion, the article highlights the urgent need for a modal shift to rail transport in order to combat climate change, improve economic conditions, and enhance the quality of life—especially important as India strives to meet its climate goals. With proper investment and planning, this transition presents a unique opportunity for sustainable development.

The summer of 2025 in India has shown unusual weather patterns characterized by high day temperatures not exceeding typical summer highs, absence of heatwaves, and a significant increase in rainfall in many regions, especially notable for the month of May. Key observations and trends made by the India Meteorological Department (IMD) include:

• Temperature Trends:

  • No record-breaking temperatures have been observed from March to mid-May, with temperatures generally remaining normal across most parts of India.
  • April experienced some short heatwave spells in regions like Maharashtra, Odisha, and Jammu and Kashmir, while Gujarat and Rajasthan experienced slightly longer episodes of heat.
  • The Core Heatwave Zone (CHZ) that typically faces intense heat from March to June has largely avoided significant heatwave conditions so far this year.

• Rainfall Patterns:

  • Southern Peninsular India has seen intermittent rainfall throughout the pre-monsoon season, which commenced in April and continued into May, resulting in a wetter-than-usual summer.
  • May is usually marked by higher daytime temperatures across North, Northwest, and Central India; however, these regions have only encountered heatwave conditions on one day, May 1, in a small area of southwest Rajasthan.

• Weather Influences:

  • Frequent western disturbances originating from the Mediterranean have passed through India, enhancing rainfall events and maintaining cooler temperatures across various regions. There have been four such disturbances in March and April, and two additional ones reported in May.
  • Moisture influx from the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea has contributed to increased rainfall and thundershowers, substantially lowering maximum temperatures by 5-7 degrees Celsius after thunderstorms.

• May Weather Specifics:

  • The month has been described as exceptionally wet, with significant rainfall particularly in South and Central Indian areas. The average rainfall during the week of May 2-8 recorded a 20% surplus, while the subsequent week continued to witness ample rainfall due to ongoing disturbances, sustaining a 35% above-normal rainfall rate.

• Temperature and Rainfall Comparisons:

  • From May 8 to May 14, maximum temperatures across West, Central, and Eastern India were reported to be 3-5 degrees Celsius below normal, as well as the minimum temperatures in the East and Central regions being 1-3 degrees Celsius below normal.

• Monsoon Considerations:

  • The southwest monsoon, marking a critical shift in weather patterns for the region, is anticipated to begin its arrival in India, potentially impacting Kerala by May 27.
  • Even with temperatures remaining normal or below, there is a forecasted development of heatwave conditions in Northwest India, particularly in Rajasthan and Haryana, towards the end of May.

In summary, the summer of 2025 features an atypical weather pattern in India, where cooler-than-average temperatures and increased rainfall are prevailing, likely influenced by western disturbances and moisture influx. The anticipated onset of the monsoon later this month may further influence the ongoing climatic conditions and agricultural planning.

Key Points:

• 2025 saw unusual weather with normal temperatures and a lack of heatwaves up to mid-May.
• Exceptional rainfall has characterized May, deviating from the usual heatwave conditions.
• Frequent western disturbances have been responsible for increased rainfall and cooler temperatures.
• Significant temperature drops followed thunderstorms, maintaining lower overall temperature averages.
• The southwest monsoon is expected to hit the Indian coast around May 27, potentially influencing further weather trends.

The article discusses the crucial role of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) in safeguarding ecosystems, wildlife, and public health within developmental projects in India. However, recent years have seen a significant undermining of these standards, particularly through changes made by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). Here are the key points presented in the article:

• Role of Environmental Clearances: Environmental clearances are designed to ensure that developmental projects do not harm ecosystems, wildlife, or public health. They are intended to foster a balance between development and sustainability as per the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Rules of 2006.

• Policy Changes: In 2017, a notification from MoEFCC allowed developers to obtain environmental clearances after commencing their projects, creating a system of post-facto clearances. This practice was further solidified in 2021 with an Office Memorandum aimed at handling violations.

• Supreme Court Intervention: The Supreme Court of India has criticized the government for protecting entities that harm the environment. On May 16, a two-judge bench struck down the 2017 notification and the 2021 OM as unconstitutional.

• Previous Court Rulings: The article references earlier cases, including Common Cause vs Union of India (2017), where the court identified serious lapses in allowing large-scale mining without the required clearances. Additionally, in 2020, the Supreme Court stated that post-facto clearances contradict fundamental environmental principles.

• Consequences of Lax Regulations: The regulatory laxity since the 2017 notification has enabled over 50 projects, including coal and iron mines and cement plants, to advance without proper environmental scrutiny. This scenario has raised concerns about its consequences on public health and the environment.

• Environmental Jurisprudence: The Supreme Court has progressively expanded Article 21, which guarantees the right to life, to include the right to a healthy environment. The latest ruling reaffirms the relationship between regulatory diligence and the right to life amidst a growing pollution crisis in urban India.

• Policymaking Flaws: The article points out the governmental perspective that often views development and sustainability as opposing priorities, prioritizing business ease over environmental protection. The Supreme Court emphasizes that environmental conservation should be integral to the development process.

• Need for Change in Government Attitude: It is crucial for policymakers to recognize that development and environmental conservation are not mutually exclusive. The court's assertion that "conservation of the environment and its improvement is essential to the concept of development" should guide regulatory processes moving forward.

In conclusion, the article outlines the significant legal and environmental implications resulting from the government’s previous policies on environmental clearances and emphasizes the Supreme Court's insistence on upholding strict environmental standards in relation to developmental projects in India.

Important Sentences:

• Environmental clearances are essential for ensuring developmental projects do not harm ecosystems and public health.
• The 2017 notification allowing post-facto clearances undermines the precautionary principle of the EIA Rules.
• The Supreme Court has condemned the government for diluting environmental protections.
• Lax regulatory practices have led to over 50 development projects advancing without proper scrutiny, risking public health and ecological integrity.
• The Court links regulatory diligence with the right to a healthy environment, expanding the interpretation of Article 21.
• There is a need for policymakers to view development and environmental conservation as complementary rather than opposing forces.

In Madhya Pradesh's Shahdol district, three villagers lost their lives due to separate elephant attacks on the same day, inciting fear among local communities. The victims were collecting tendu leaves in forest areas when they encountered the elephants, which reportedly had strayed from Bandhavgarh. In response to these tragic incidents, Chief Minister Mohan Yadav announced financial assistance of Rs 25 lakh for the legal dependents of each victim.

Summary of the Incidents

• Victims Identified:

  • Umesh Kol (40) from Sanousi village was killed while collecting leaves with his wife; she managed to escape by climbing a tree.
  • Devganiya Baiga (65) from Dhonda village was fatally attacked in the Doda forest.
  • Mohan Lal Patel (80) from Barachh village was killed near Kolhuwa-Ghatwa.

• Nature of Attacks:

  • All incidents involved unexpected encounters with elephants in forested areas.
  • The elephants retreated to the Sanjay Gandhi Tiger Reserve following the attacks.

Rising Human-Elephant Conflict

• The deaths have heightened local concerns regarding human-elephant conflicts, particularly as a herd of over two dozen elephants has been present in the Beohari forests for months.
• A wildlife officer indicated that around 10 elephant deaths due to mycotoxin poisoning were reported in October 2024, heightening awareness of the issue.

Government Response

• The Madhya Pradesh Cabinet has approved a comprehensive Rs 47.11-crore action plan aimed at managing wild elephants and alleviating human-elephant conflicts.

  • Plan Duration: The initiative covers the period from 2023-2024 to 2026-2027.
  • Budget Allocation:
    • Rs 1.52 crore has already been spent during the initial two fiscal years.
    • Future allocations include Rs 20 crore for 2025-2026 and Rs 25.59 crore for 2026-2027.

• Planned Actions:

  • Surveillance and monitoring of elephant behavior both inside and outside protected areas will be reinforced.
  • The plan includes habitat development and infrastructure improvements aimed at reducing human-wildlife conflict.
  • Control rooms with surveillance systems will be established.
  • Expansion of rescue and rehabilitation efforts is also planned.
  • Local villagers, forest staff, and Department officials will receive training to manage conflict zones more effectively.

Key Points

• Three villagers were killed by elephants in Shahdol district, spreading fear in nearby communities.
• Umesh Kol, Devganiya Baiga, and Mohan Lal Patel were the victims, attacked while collecting tendu leaves.
• The incidents highlight the growing concern over human-elephant conflict in the region.
• A government action plan of Rs 47.11 crore has been approved to address these issues and is set to run from 2023-2027.
• The plan involves measures for monitoring, habitat development, surveillance, and training for local communities.

The incidents represent a grave challenge in balancing human activities with wildlife conservation, particularly in regions experiencing increased elephant populations. The government’s response aims to mitigate risks for villagers while ensuring the well-being of the elephant population.

The Supreme Court of India has ruled against the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), declaring a notification issued in 2017 that allowed for ex-post facto clearances of environmental laws as illegal. This decision came in response to multiple petitions challenging the notification. The Court also annulled a subsequent 2021 office memorandum that established a procedural framework for such clearances, emphasizing that the Centre cannot issue similar notifications in the future.

Key Points:

• Supreme Court Judgment: The Court struck down a 2017 notification by the MoEF&CC, which allowed projects to obtain retroactive environmental clearances after construction had commenced.
• 2021 Office Memorandum: This circular, which aimed to streamline the process of post facto clearance for projects, was also invalidated by the court.
• Environment Impact Assessment (EIA): The EIA process, established in 2006, requires prior environmental clearance before starting any project, considering the potential impact on the environment, human health, and social infrastructure.
• Rationale Behind 2017 Notification: The MoEF&CC argued that allowing ex-post facto clearances would help regulate violations instead of leaving them unchecked and ensure that violators are made to remediate environmental damage.
• Supreme Court’s Critique: The Court criticized the Centre for attempting to protect polluters, highlighting a constitutional mandate to guarantee a right to a healthy and pollution-free environment (Article 21).
• Violations of Past Judgments: The Court referenced earlier decisions that deemed post facto clearances incompatible with fundamental principles of environmental law, reiterating that the attempts to introduce such measures were both illegal and went against established legal precedents.
• Outcome: The Supreme Court mandated the Centre not to enact any future regulations akin to the 2017 notification or 2021 SOP, upholding environmental protections and reinforcing the necessity for preventive measures instead of reactive approvals.

Further Implications:

• The ruling casts a significant spotlight on the tensions between development and environmental protection in India, emphasizing the need for projects to adhere to environmental laws from their inception.
• This decision aligns with ongoing debates about sustainable development practices in the country, particularly where economic growth may come at an environmental cost.
• The Supreme Court’s firm stance reiterates the importance of compliance with established environmental laws, aiming to deter future violations and uphold ecological integrity.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's decision serves as a strong reaffirmation of India's commitment to environmental protection, mandating strict adherence to regulatory frameworks designed to assess and mitigate the impacts of developmental projects on the environment, human health, and society.

The article discusses the situation concerning Kankati, a 23-month-old tigress in Ranthambore, Rajasthan, who has killed two individuals in the past month. This alarming behavior stems from her upbringing, as she and her siblings were raised on live bait provided to their mother, Arrowhead. Experts highlight the danger posed to both forest staff and tourists by Kankati and potentially her siblings due to their learned habits around human presence and feeding practices.

Key Points:

• Kankati's Behavior: Kankati has shown aggressive behavior, having killed two people in less than a month. This is attributed to her and her siblings being raised with live bait, which has led to a dangerous habituation to humans.

• History of Live Baiting: Live baiting, where prey animals like buffalo are offered to attract tigers, was primarily used by hunters in colonial times. Although hunting tigers was banned in the 1970s, live baiting continued until officially prohibited in the 1980s for tourism purposes.

• Live Baiting Practices: While generally prohibited, live baiting is still permitted to assist injured or older tigers as per the National Tiger Conservation Authority's (NTCA) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Experts warn that artificially feeding tigers disrupts natural processes and can lead to human-wildlife conflict.

• Misplaced Kindness: Experts express concern regarding public sentiment favoring "kindness" towards tigers, which has resulted in inappropriate interventions like consistent baiting, ultimately leading to habituation and dangerous behavior.

• Consequences for Raised Tigers: The article references examples where tigers raised on live bait have varied outcomes; some survive longer, while others fail to adjust to wild survival after being consistently fed, jeopardizing their natural instincts.

• Increased Human Intervention: The growing trend of medical interventions for tigers incurs risks, including dependence on human care and potential conflict with local communities. Experts advocate for minimal human intervention, emphasizing the necessity to preserve natural habitats as essential for tiger survival.

• The Expert Opinions: Dr. Rajesh Gopal and other conservationists stress that true wildlife conservation requires letting natural processes occur, without excessive human involvement in the lives of tigers.

In conclusion, the article highlights serious implications surrounding the management of tiger populations, emphasizing the importance of respecting natural wildlife processes while being cautious of the dangerous habits fostered by previous interventions. Conservation efforts should focus on preserving habitats rather than artificially sustaining individual animals.

Tension has escalated in the Vazhathurthi area near Kozhikode due to allegations of illegal landfilling in the Kottooli wetlands. On May 17, 2025, workers from the Sarovaram Prakrithi Samrakshana Samithi and the Vazhathuruthi Residents’ Association intervened to stop the removal of concrete from a school courtyard, which they asserted was being repurposed for dumping in the wetlands. This location previously witnessed illegal landfilling activity, resulting in a high court order that mandated the maintenance of the status quo.

Key Events and Details:

• Local residents observed the removal of concrete from a school's courtyard, allegedly for tiling purposes, and noticed that it was being dumped into the adjacent wetlands.
• The area had previously seen illegal landfilling, prompting community action and a legal directive from the Kerala high court to maintain existing conditions.
• P.M. Jeejabai, Secretary of the Vazhathuruthy Residents Association, emphasized that the school was not merely preparing to re-tile but was contributing to additional dumping of construction waste in the wetlands.
• The Revenue Department confiscated an earthmover used in the alleged illegal dumping, indicating an official recognition of the violation of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
• Following the incident, residents confronted school management about their activities, indicating strong community opposition to continued landfilling.
• The Samithi intends to file a petition with the District Collector under the Right to Information Act concerning the disappearance of another earthmover, previously confiscated for destroying mangroves.
• There is a report that this second earthmover went missing after the destruction of CCTV cameras in the area, compounding concerns over transparency and accountability.

In summary, the situation at Vazhathuruthi underscores ongoing struggles between local communities seeking to protect environmental resources and entities allegedly engaging in environmentally harmful activities. The involvement of local authorities and the legal system reflects the community's commitment to preserving the integrity of the Kottooli wetlands.

Important Sentences

• Tension is rising in Vazhathurthi, Kozhikode, over illegal landfilling of Kottooli wetlands.
• Workers from local organizations halted the removal of school courtyard concrete for potential dumping in wetlands.
• Prior landfilling in this area had led to a high court order for preservation.
• The local community witnessed construction waste dumping alongside the school building into the wetlands.
• The Revenue Department seized the earthmover used for alleged illegal activity, highlighting the law's presence.
• Residents are pressing the school management for clarifications regarding their activities.
• A petition under the Right to Information Act is set to be filed about the disappearance of another confiscated earthmover.
• CCTV cameras had been damaged, raising concerns over accountability regarding illegal activities in the area.