iAspirants
Current AffairsPrelims PYQsUPSC CSE SyllabusUPSC CSE StrategyBlogsPricing
Login
iAspirants
Current AffairsPrelims PYQsUPSC CSE SyllabusUPSC CSE StrategyBlogsPricingContact UsLoginSignUp
iAspirants

Your AI-powered companion for UPSC preparation.

Study Resources

  • Current Affairs
  • Prelims PYQs
  • UPSC CSE Syllabus
  • UPSC CSE Strategy
  • Blogs

Practice & Plans

  • Mains Answer Evaluation
  • Pricing
  • Sign Up
  • Login

Company

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Return Policy

© 2026 iAspirants, Inc. All rights reserved.

  1. Blogs
  2. National and International Importance

India's Third Nuclear Ballistic Submarine

Published on: 04-Apr-2026

Source: Indian Express

Share this post

India's Third Nuclear Ballistic Submarine

Article Summary

Summary of Nuclear-Powered Submarine INS Aridaman Induction

Key Facts

  • Date of Induction: INS Aridaman commissioned on 4 April 2026.
  • Type: Third nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) in India.
  • Weight: 7,000 tons.
  • Missile Capacity: Eight vertical launching system tubes, capable of holding K-15 and K-4 SLBMs:
    • K-15 SLBM: Range over 700 km.
    • K-4 SLBM: Range of 3,500 km.

Strategic Significance

  • Enhances India's sea-based nuclear deterrence capabilities.
  • Established India’s nuclear triad:
    • Land-based: Agni missile series.
    • Air-based: Fighter jets including Rafales, Su-30MKIs, and Mirage 2000s.
    • Sea-based: Operational with INS Arihant, INS Arighaat, and now INS Aridaman.
  • Supports India’s "no first use" nuclear doctrine, ensuring a second-strike capability.

Development and Background

  • Part of a nuclear-powered submarine program initiated over three decades ago, involving private firms and the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) with Russian assistance.
  • INS Arihant: Launched in 2009, commissioned in 2016 - first of its kind for India.
  • INS Arighaat: Commissioned in 2024, technologically advanced compared to INS Arihant.
  • Future plans include constructing a fourth SSBN and developing indigenous nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs).

National Defense Context

  • India operates 16 conventional submarines, includes:
    • 6 Kalvari-class (with French collaboration).
    • 4 Shishumar-class.
    • 6 Kilo-class (Sindhughosh).
  • Authorized submarine strength is 18, but operationally only a fraction (approximately 70%) are active due to refits.

International Comparison

  • Comparison with other nations:
    • USA: 14 Ohio-class SSBNs, 53 fast-attack submarines.
    • China: 12 nuclear submarines, including 6 nuclear-powered attack submarines.

Important Collaborations and Programs

  • Ongoing collaboration with Germany for Project-75I, aiming to construct six advanced AIP-equipped conventional submarines with ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems and Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Plans to lease a nuclear-powered attack submarine from Russia expected by 2027-28.

Constitutional and Policy Framework

  • India’s nuclear policy emphasizes deterrence and retaliation as per its doctrine, ensuring a responsive capability against potential nuclear threats.

This analysis provides an insightful view into India's strategic defense advancements with the launch of INS Aridaman, outlining the technological capabilities and future directions in bolstering national security.

Key Terms & Concepts

INS AridamanThird nuclear-powered submarine
INS ArihantFirst nuclear-powered submarine
INS ArighaatSecond nuclear-powered submarine
Agni seriesNuclear missile system
K-15 SLBMSubmarine-launched missile
K-4 SLBMLonger-range missile
Nuclear triadDefense strategy
83 MW pressurised light-water reactorPower source for submarines
Project-75ISubmarine construction program
ThyssenKrupp Marine SystemsGerman partner for submarine construction
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders LtdIndian shipbuilding partner
60% operational submarine strengthFleet management metric
US Ohio-class SSBNs

Mind Map for UPSC Civil Services Revision

Turn UPSC Civil Services Current Affairs Into Exam-Ready Notes

Reading National and International Importance current affairs is half the work. Revise them with ready-made notes and test what actually stuck.

  • Daily UPSC Civil Services current affairs analysis
  • Revision notes, mind maps & MCQs
  • Prelims mock tests with instant results

Related UPSC Civil Services Current Affairs Articles

Racism and Protests in France
National and International Importance29-Oct-2026

Racism and Protests in France

Key Facts and Summary Notes:

Violence and Crime:

  • Date: October 23
  • Location: Trappes and La Verrière, immigrant townships near Paris, France.
  • Incident: Kevin T, a White Frenchman, shot Pengo Bossio Wang, a Black martial arts amateur, killing him, and critically injuring a 12-year-old North African girl, along with three others.
Comparison of submarine strength
China nuclear submarinesComparison of submarine capability
Practise Mains answer writingUpload a handwritten answer and get it evaluated
  • Observations: The violence followed tensions rooted in a high-school protest sparked by issues such as poor school conditions and reform demands.
  • High-School Protests:

    • Causes: Protests by French high schoolers began due to:
      • Deteriorating school infrastructure.
      • Teacher shortages.
      • Overcrowded classrooms.
      • The selection system "Parcoursup", which sorts students early in life.
    • Response from Government: Silence, failing to address underlying issues.

    Escalation and Response:

    • Protest Dynamics: The protests began peacefully with school blockades and took a violent turn due to police repression.
    • Student Arrests: Thousands of students aged 14-18 were arrested as clashes escalated.
    • Major Protest: On October 17, an estimated 800,000 people, including trade unions and students, participated in "cost of living" protests which ended in violence attributed to external "les casseurs" groups.

    Political and Social Commentary:

    • President Emmanuel Macron referred to the shooting and subsequent violence as a “turning point” in French history.
    • The results: Apart from the tragic loss of life and injuries, mass unrest incurred significant damage to heritage and property and raised concerns about societal divisions.

    Responsibility and Media Role:

    • Blame Allocation: Various political factions debated responsibility:
      • Far-left: Criticized police for mismanagement and inadequate action against looters.
      • Far-right: Insulting rhetoric directed at immigrants, calling them “suburban riff-raff” and “Allah’s revolutionaries,” which fueled racist sentiments and violence.
    • Media’s Role: Highlighted the responsibility of media in perpetuating division and hate through sensationalism.

    Government Response:

    • Outcomes: After weeks of protests and violence, the French government, led by President Macron, ultimately acknowledged some student demands.
    • Economic Impact: The cost of the unrest ran into billions of euros in damages and arrests, leading to calls for policy and systemic reform.

    Historical Context:

    • The protests are reminiscent of pivotal historical movements in France such as the French Revolution of 1789 and the May 1968 protests, reflecting deep-rooted themes of social justice and civil rights.

    Conclusion:

    This crisis underscores the precarious balance between youth activism, governmental accountability, and societal divisions in contemporary France. It raises vital questions about freedom of expression, media influence, and the role of law enforcement in civil unrest contexts.

    Cyclone Arnab Impacts Andhra Pradesh Flights
    National and International Importance28-Oct-2026

    Cyclone Arnab Impacts Andhra Pradesh Flights

    Cyclone Arnab and Its Impact on Air Travel in Andhra Pradesh

    • Event: Cyclone Arnab, expected to cross the Andhra Pradesh coast on October 28, 2026, predicted to intensify into a very severe cyclone with wind speeds of 125–135 km/h.

    • Affected Areas: Coastal Andhra Pradesh and southern Odisha (including Bhubaneswar) will face flight disruptions. Potential knock-on delays noted for Hyderabad, Varanasi, Prayagraj, and Gorakhpur based on cyclone track.

    • Official Response:

      • Review meeting held by the Ministry of Civil Aviation to ensure flight safety.
      • Emphasis on interagency coordination among stakeholders, including:
        • Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)
        • Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS)
        • Airports Authority of India (AAI)
        • India Meteorological Department (IMD)
        • Airlines
        • Airport operators
        • National Disaster Response Force (NDRF)
    • Flight Operations:

      • Cancellation of various flights to and from Visakhapatnam on October 28, 2026.
      • Operations at Visakhapatnam airport suspended since October 27, afternoon.
      • Flights at Vijayawada and Rajahmundry airports also suspended after 7 p.m. on October 27.
    • Guidelines Issued:

      • Airlines advised to follow operational guidelines for adverse weather.
      • Airlines to inform passengers about delays, cancellations and to comply with re-booking and refund norms.

    Contextual Understanding:

    • Impact of Cyclones: Natural disasters like cyclones disrupt transportation and necessitate government and inter-agency coordination for safety measures and crisis management.

    • Government Schemes & Policies: This situation highlights the importance of disaster management policies and preparedness laid out by government entities to mitigate the effects of natural disasters on public safety and transport.

    Conclusion: Cyclone Arnab serves as a significant reminder of the unpredictability of weather events and the importance of coordinated efforts among various civil aviation and disaster management authorities to ensure public safety and minimize disruptions.

    Protests Erupt Over Siang Dam Project
    National and International Importance26-Oct-2026

    Protests Erupt Over Siang Dam Project

    Exam-Focused Notes on Siang Dam Protests in Arunachal Pradesh

    Key Facts:

    • Location: Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
    • Project: Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) proposed capacity of 11,200 MW by NHPC Limited.
    • Protests: Recent violent protests against the dam; security measures in place, with law enforcement using tear gas against demonstrators.

    Constitutional References:

    • Restrictions on public gatherings enforced under Section 163 of the BNSS.

    Government Policies & Schemes:

    • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): NHPC has spent Rs 16.61 crore on the Siang district administration and Rs 94.29 crore in Upper Siang for CSR activities.
    • Public relations campaign engaged to counter negative perceptions of the project during a Rs 10.91 crore contract with Concept Public Relations. The aim was to promote development opportunities related to the project.

    Judicial References:

    • No specific judicial pronouncements reported, but local governance and responses highlight administrative action post-violence.

    Economic Indicators:

    • The dam project is positioned as a strategic response to water security concerns, particularly regarding China's upstream dam activities. The state government claims it is a focal point of national importance.

    International Context:

    • The proposed dam is linked to broader national security issues in response to international developments, particularly related to neighboring China.

    Environmental Concerns:

    • Opposition from the Siang Indigenous Farmers' Forum (SIFF) due to fears of submergence, displacement, and environmental degradation. Concerns raised include loss of livelihoods, ancestral lands, and agricultural viability along riverbanks.

    Community Engagement:

    • NHPC initiated extensive community outreach involving village elders, NGOs, and local influencers, reflecting attempts to build a narrative around the project while addressing misinformation.

    Political Landscape:

    • Mixed sentiments among stakeholders: While some government officials claim that 85% of residents support the project, significant local opposition persists, emphasizing a lack of trust and consultation with the affected communities.

    Notable Statements/Actions:

    • Chief Minister Pema Khandu emphasized the need for accurate information to mitigate fears surrounding the dam project and asserted that misinformation contributes to unrest.
    • Local MLA Ojing Tasing suggested that unrest is politically motivated, promoting the view that the majority support the project, contrasting local accounts of resistance.

    Societal Impact:

    • Residents express deep dependence on riverbank resources for agriculture and livestock, indicating significant socio-economic implications if the dam proceeds.

    Historical Context:

    • The proposed dam project is still in the pre-feasibility survey stage, and local opposition has been longstanding, underscoring the historical grievances and land rights issues in the region.

    Summary:

    The protests against the Siang dam in Arunachal Pradesh illustrate a complex interplay of economic development, environmental concerns, cultural identity, and local governance. The government, while asserting support for the hydroelectric project, faces significant challenges in addressing the fears and objections of the indigenous populations affected by it.