New Employment Act Replaces MGNREGA
Published on:
Share this post

Article Summary
Summary of the Viksit Bharat - Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G), 2025 Act
Constitutional References
- Article 21: Guarantees the right to life and has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to include the right to livelihood (Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 1985).
- 73rd Constitutional Amendment: MGNREGA reinforced panchayat raj institutions.
Legislative Context
- VB-G RAM G Act, 2025: Replaces MGNREGA; received Presidential assent.
- The Supreme Court (Swaraj Abhiyan case, 2018) mandated compensation from the Union government for delays in MGNREGA payment, which is not mirrored in the new Act.
Key Features of MGNREGA
- Implemented as a justiciable right to work, unemployment allowance, timely wage payments, and gender wage parity.
- Strengthened rural income and community empowerment.
- A study indicated a 21% decrease in reliance on money lenders and increased school enrollment.
- Approximately 45% of female workers engaged in MGNREGA transitioned from non-work to active employment, with female participation averaging 58% over five years.
VB-G RAM G Act Changes
- Governance Structure: Grants discretionary powers to the Union government regarding public works (Section 5(1)).
- Funding Structure: Altered from a 90:10 (Centre:States) ratio under MGNREGA to 60:40 for the new Act (Section 22).
- Introduces a command-driven allocation model, risking local autonomy essential to MGNREGA.
Unemployment Provisions
- Proposes 125 days of employment per household annually, although current average workdays hover around 50 due to funding uncertainties.
- Employment provisions include 60 days of no work during agricultural seasons, potentially exacerbating inequalities.
Economic Implications
- Concerns over state ability to provide employment as fiscal constraints could limit work demand, leading to increased unemployment and migration.
- MGNREGA’s 5 positive outcomes: (a) universality, (b) increased rural incomes, (c) countering inequalities, (d) creation of quality assets, (e) community empowerment.
Criticism and Consequences
- Underfunding: Lead to wage payment delays and corruption, potentially worsening with VB-G RAM G.
- Concerns regarding local governance principles being undermined.
- No new anti-corruption mechanisms introduced in the new Act.
International Recognition and Comparisons
- MGNREGA recognized by the World Bank as a "stellar example" of rural development in 2014, reversing earlier criticism.
- Viewed as a combination of Mahatma Gandhi's local governance ideology and B.R. Ambedkar's empowerment principles.
This summary encapsulates the transition from MGNREGA to VB-G RAM G, highlighting constitutional framings, legislative changes, socio-economic impacts, and critical evaluations.
Key Terms & Concepts
| VB-G RAM G | New employment guarantee act |
| MGNREGA | Previous employment guarantee act |
| Article 21 | Guarantees right to life |
| Supreme Court | Judiciary body ruling |
| 15 days | Payment delay compensation timeline |
| 58% | Female participation rate in MGNREGA |
| 90% | Union government bears expenditure |
| 60:40 | Altered fund ratio for states |
| 125 days | Claimed employment per household |
| 2018 | Year of Supreme Court ruling |




