iAspirants
Current AffairsPrelims PYQsUPSC CSE SyllabusUPSC CSE StrategyBlogsPricing
Login
iAspirants

Your AI-powered companion for UPSC preparation.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Current Affairs
  • Prelims PYQs
  • UPSC CSE Syllabus
  • UPSC CSE Strategy
  • Blogs

Company

  • Pricing
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Return Policy

© 2025 iAspirants, Inc. All rights reserved.

  1. Blogs
  2. Polity and Governance

Launch of PRAHAAR Counter-Terrorism Strategy

Published on: 29-Sep-2026

Source: Indian Express

Share this post

Launch of PRAHAAR Counter-Terrorism Strategy

Article Summary

Counter-Terrorism Framework: PRAHAAR

  1. Initiative Overview:

    • Union Home Minister Amit Shah inaugurated the conference on ‘PRAHAAR – CT Policy and Strategy’ aiming for a strengthened counter-terrorism framework in India.
  2. PRAHAAR Framework:

    • Represents seven pillars:
      1. Prevention
      2. Response
      3. Aggregating Internal Capacities
      4. Human Rights
      5. Attenuating Conditions for Terrorism
      6. Aligning International Efforts
      7. Recovery and Resilience
  3. Policy Stance:

    • The Indian government, under PM Narendra Modi, has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards terrorism.
  4. Strategic Implementation:

    • Emphasis on translating PRAHAAR principles to the thana (police station) level for effective local governance.
    • Continuous monitoring and analysis of terrorist incidents will guide the strategy for the next decade.
    • Importance of inter-agency coordination to eliminate delays in counter-terrorism actions.
  5. New Initiatives:

    • Launch of an extradition portal aimed at expediting the return of fugitives from abroad.
    • Urged state police forces to establish dedicated teams for fugitive tracking.
  6. Conference Goals:

    • Facilitate collaboration between Central and state agencies regarding:
      • Counter-terrorism policies
      • Operational preparedness
      • Inter-agency responses
      • Building long-term resilience against terror threats.
  7. Data Highlights:

    • Between 2019 and 2026, the Indian government successfully repatriated 288 fugitive criminals from 36 countries.
    • Enhanced inter-agency coordination has led to the dismantling of over 40 modules of the Shahzad Bhatti Network, linked to cross-border smuggling of arms, explosives, and drugs.
  8. Attendees:

    • Senior officials including:
      • Union Home Secretary
      • Foreign Secretary
      • Heads of Central Armed Police Forces
      • Directors General of Police from 15 states
      • Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) chiefs from all states and Union Territories.

This summary encapsulates India's focused approach toward a comprehensive counter-terrorism strategy aimed at enhancing national security and effective law enforcement through institutional collaboration and international cooperation.

Key Terms & Concepts

PRAHAARCounter-terrorism framework
Zero-tolerance policyGovernment stance on terrorism
Extradition portalTool for tracking fugitives
288 fugitive criminalsCriminals brought back to India
36 countriesCountries involved in extraditions
Shahzad Bhatti NetworkCriminal network dismantled
40 modulesTerror modules dismantled
10 yearsDuration for PRAHAAR strategy

Mind Map for UPSC Civil Services Revision

Turn UPSC Civil Services Current Affairs Into Exam-Ready Notes

Reading Polity and Governance current affairs is half the work. Revise them with ready-made notes and test what actually stuck.

  • Daily UPSC Civil Services current affairs analysis
  • Revision notes, mind maps & MCQs
  • Prelims mock tests with instant results

Related UPSC Civil Services Current Affairs Articles

Impeachment of Chief Election Commissioner
Polity and Governance29-Sep-2026

Impeachment of Chief Election Commissioner

Summary of Key Points and Legal Framework Relating to the Election Commission and Impeachment

Constitutional References:

  • Article 324(5): Details the process of removing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and other Election Commissioners, requiring impeachment for "proved misbehaviour or incapacity".
  • Article 124(4): Additionally refers to the conditions under which the CEC can be impeached.
  • Legal Framework:

    • Supreme Court Judgment (Anoop Baranwal): Asserts norms expected of Election Commissioners including independence, impartiality, integrity, propriety, equality, and diligence.
    • Representation of the People Act, 1950 (Section 32(1)): Criminalizes actions by election officials that breach their duty in electoral roll preparation.

    Election Commission Issues:

    1. Admittance of Impropriety: The ECI's press note (September 26) indicates failures such as no documented meeting agendas or minutes over the past year, raising concerns about the legality of major decisions made without proper protocol.

    2. Changes to Form 6:

      • Misrepresentation of Supreme Court Ruling: The ECI claimed that modifications to Form 6 were legally sanctioned, which contradicts assessments by legal commentators.
      • Unauthorized Changes: The ECI admitted to reverting back to the original Form 6 due to objections from two Election Commissioners, indicating prior violations of law.
      • Pressure on Voters: Reports suggest that the ECI misled voters who were wrongfully removed from rolls to falsely declare themselves as new voters to re-register.
    3. ECINET System Review: The ECI's decision to form a committee to verify the compliance of ECINET (the online portal for managing electoral rolls) indicates uncertainty over the legality of previously processed deletions of over 13 crore names, reflecting on procedural integrity.

    Impeachment Considerations:

    • The cumulative evidence suggests grave lapses in duties by the CEC and other commissioners, including blatant violations of both legal and procedural frameworks, thus justifying a strong basis for potential impeachment.

    Implications:

    • The highlighted admissions from the ECI underscore serious allegations regarding governance within the election administration, with potential constitutional ramifications affecting electoral integrity.

    Conclusion:

    The findings present a considerable case of dereliction against the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commission, raising significant questions on electoral integrity and procedural adherence, with strong grounds for impeachment under the existing legal framework.

    Concerns Rise Over Voter Deletions
    Polity and Governance28-Sep-2026

    Concerns Rise Over Voter Deletions

    Key Summary Notes on Voter Registration and Electoral Roll Issues in India

    Constitutional References:

    • Right to Vote: The right to vote is fundamental to Indian democracy, underlined by various articles in the Constitution, including Article 326, which provides for the elections to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies to be on the basis of universal adult suffrage.

    Electoral Commission Allegations:

    • An explosive report indicates that two Election Commissioners raised formal objections at least 14 times over 10 months against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, highlighting concerns about unauthorized changes to voter registration processes.
    • The elections are currently under a Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which led to more than 54.6% of Delhi's existing voters being flagged for deletion or verification, cuing significant democracy concerns.

    Voter Data Statistics:

    • In total, Delhi has 1.45 crore registered voters; over 80 lakh are currently under scrutiny by the Election Commission of India (ECI).
    • Notable deletions include 47.5 lakh marked for being Absent, Shifted, Dead, or Duplicate, while 33.13 lakh face operational errors.
    • National estimates suggest a potential loss of 12 to 13 crore voters across the country, with states such as Maharashtra projected to lose 2 crore voters by the exercise's end.

    Judicial and Administrative Concerns:

    • The Supreme Court has upheld the legality of the SIR, but former election officials have questioned its fairness and potential voter disenfranchisement.
    • Flawed internal databases of the ECI have resulted in incorrect flagging of legitimate voters due to clerical errors, impacting their right to vote and eligibility for essential services.

    Government Schemes & Electoral Integrity:

    • Existing schemes that rely on valid voter registration are at risk as the SIR process yields erroneous deletions, affecting essential benefits for individuals who are legitimate voters.

    Reports from Other States:

    • West Bengal: Discrepancies led to 27 lakh voters flagged for review, with 91% of appeals revealing wrongful deletions.
    • In Bihar, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu, revisions were executed right before major elections, heightening disenfranchisement risks.

    Administrative Processes:

    • Concerns have been raised regarding the delegation of quasi-judicial powers to Booth Level Officers (often teachers) who verify citizenship, potentially leading to arbitrary disenfranchisement.
    • The process has raised doubts about the integrity of electoral rolls as the adult population has increased, yet the number of registered voters is contracted.

    Implications for Democracy:

    • Analysts suggest that these practices could reduce the national electorate to 88 crore, disenfranchising around 15 crore citizens, which contradicts demographic growth trends.
    • This administration-driven purging of voters risks undermining democratic integrity and public faith in electoral processes.

    Conclusion:

    It is critical that the ECI re-evaluates the SIR process to uphold the credibility of electoral rolls, ensuring that stakeholder rights are protected and democracy is preserved. The administrative actions and their timing raise fundamental questions about the electoral system's integrity and need reform or reconsideration to avoid disenfranchisement of legitimate voters.

    Credibility Crisis of Election Commission
    Polity and Governance28-Sep-2026

    Credibility Crisis of Election Commission

    Summary of Key Facts and Issues Regarding the Election Commission of India (ECI):

    1. Constitutional Body Functionality:

      • The ECI is expected to function independently, in accordance with constitutional mandates, similar to the tenure of T.N. Seshan.
      • The current perception is that ECI has become susceptible to political pressures, which undermines its constitutional role.
    2. Allegations of Compromised Integrity:

      • Serious allegations are being raised regarding the credibility and independence of the ECI, as evidenced by dissent from two Election Commissioners regarding the electoral-roll revision process.
      • Concerns center around the handling of the Electoral Roll Online Network (ERONet), modifications to Form 6, and the exclusion of eligible voters.
    3. Dissent and Accountability:

      • The dissent from the Election Commissioners indicates internal disagreements on the electoral processes, highlighting potential accountability issues within the ECI itself.
    Digital News Publishers' Code of Ethics
    Polity and Governance28-Sep-2026

    Digital News Publishers' Code of Ethics

    Digital News Publishers Association: Code of Ethics Overview

    Constitutional References

    • Article 19(1)(a): Right to freedom of speech and expression, ensuring independence in the gathering and dissemination of news.

    Key Legal Frameworks

    • Information Technology Act, 2000: Governs aspects of digital content and sets penalties for various infractions.
    • Provisions related to media operations from Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
    • Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules, 2011: Outlines responsibilities for online intermediaries.

    Ethical Standards and Practices

    • Digital news publishers are committed to adhering to laws related to media operation and maintaining high journalistic standards.
    • Accuracy, transparency, and fairness are essential, necessitating pre-publication verification to prevent dissemination of misinformation.
    • Grievance redressal mechanisms must be in place; complaints to be addressed within one month.
    Concerns Over Voter Deletions in India
    Polity and Governance27-Sep-2026

    Concerns Over Voter Deletions in India

    Electoral Roll Purge and Concerns in India

    Background

    • The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar faces allegations over unilateral changes to voter registration processes, raising alarms about administrative overreach in the electoral system.
    • An investigative report exposes objections from two Election Commissioners regarding alterations to new voter registration forms and mass deletions during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.

    Key Figures and Data

    • Delhi Voter Stats:

      • 54.6% of voters in Delhi (approx. 80 lakh) are currently under scrutiny by the Election Commission of India (ECI).
      • Out of 1.45 crore registered voters:
        • 47.5 lakh marked for deletion (Absent, Shifted, Dead, Duplicate).
        • 33.13 lakh flagged for errors, including:
          • 19.33 lakh marked for "logical discrepancies".
          • 13.80 lakh unmapped against 2002 electoral rolls.
      • Over 31.6 lakh notices generated by mid-September.
    • National Impact:

      • An estimated contraction of the national electorate to about 88 crore, risking disenfranchisement of about 15 crore citizens.
      • States like Maharashtra may lose up to 2 crore voters; Delhi estimates a shrinkage of 35.89%.

    Constitutional and Legal Framework

    • Supreme Court's Stance: The Supreme Court has upheld the legality of the SIR exercise, although criticisms emerge regarding its fairness.
    • Concerns on Governance: Ex-CEC S Y Quraishi highlights issues in using 2002 electoral rolls as a baseline, citing inaccuracies in historical data.
    • Delegation Concerns: Booth Level Officers (mostly teachers) are tasked with gatekeeping voter eligibility, raising questions about accountability and accuracy.

    Administrative Anomalies and Judicial Insights

    • Erroneous Deletions: Evidence from RTI disclosures indicates that 91% of flagged voters in West Bengal were found to have been wrongly deleted.
    • Regulatory Gaps: Numerous irregularities due to flawed ECI databases, including clerical errors causing 'logical discrepancies'.

    Electoral Process Implications

    • Highlighted discrepancies are putting the credibility of the electoral process at risk, with legitimate voters facing administrative chaos.
    • The timing of the SIR exercise is suspect, running right before major elections in several states, complicating citizens' ability to rectify their registrations.

    Calls to Action

    • Critics are urging a reconsideration of the SIR process to safeguard electoral integrity and address disenfranchisement.
    • Objective and fair management of electoral rolls is deemed essential for the health of India's democracy.

    Conclusion

    The ongoing scrutiny and significant voter roll purges present pressing challenges to democratic norms in India. Ensuring the right to vote, as enshrined in the Constitution, must be balanced against valid administrative needs without disenfranchising citizens. Reforms and oversight in the electoral process are critical to uphold democratic principles.

    Inauguration of Victim Rights Centre
    Polity and Governance27-Sep-2026

    Inauguration of Victim Rights Centre

    Summary of Initiatives for Victim Rights in Bihar

    Key Initiatives:

    1. Victim Rights Centre (VRC):

      • Inauguration: First VRC in Bihar, inaugurated by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant on September 26, 2026.
      • Purpose: Acts as a single window mechanism to assist victims of crimes, facilitating access to justice and support services like compensation, legal assistance, medical help, counselling, protection, and rehabilitation.
    2. Transgender Helpline:

      • A helpline specifically launched for the transgender community to overcome barriers they face in accessing justice before legal cases are formalized.
    3. Multi-Utility Vehicles:

      • Launch: Nine vehicles introduced to provide legal awareness, documentation support, and assistance in remote villages and settlements, enhancing outreach capabilities of the legal system.
    4. Book Release:

  • Critics argue that dissent without subsequent action does not fulfill the responsibility of constitutional officials to safeguard electoral integrity.
  • Issues with Electoral Rolls:

    • There are reported cases of unilateral decisions leading to the mishandling of electoral rolls, which poses a significant threat to democratic processes.
    • The reference to "14 instances of objections" suggests systemic flaws in the management of electoral data.
  • Public Response and Criticism:

    • Public sentiment shows distrust in the ECI’s ability to uphold its responsibilities, with demands for greater transparency and adherence to constitutional directives.
    • There is a recognition of potential underlying conspiracies aimed at manipulating electoral outcomes, which must be investigated and addressed appropriately.
  • Judicial Oversight:

    • If constitutional institutions are found to be compromised, legal repercussions should follow to restore public trust in the electoral system.
    • The integrity of the electoral framework is seen as vital for maintaining democracy, and judicial scrutiny may be needed to refine the processes involved.
  • Conclusion: The current situation calls for immediate reforms and reinforced independence of the ECI to ensure fair and transparent electoral processes, adhering strongly to constitutional provisions and public expectations.

    Responsibilities in Reporting

    1. Right of Reply: Inclusion of responses or comments from parties involved in news articles.
    2. Correction Policies: Mandatory editing or deletion of false or inaccurate information upon verified request from affected parties.
    3. Intellectual Property Rights: Respect for copyrights, with proper permissions and acknowledgments for content use.
    4. Sensitive Reporting: Enhanced caution in cases involving minors or sensitive subjects like child abuse, sexual harassment, and communal disputes.
    5. Privacy Respect: Care in the coverage of individuals' identities, especially in sensitive or judicial matters.

    Specialized Reporting Guidelines

    • Reporting on crime should maintain a presumption of innocence and be based on verified facts.
    • Extra caution required in reporting on situations involving victims of crimes, particularly minors.
    • Training sessions are mandated to keep editorial staff knowledgeable about applicable laws and ethical standards, including:
      • Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act
      • Right to Information Act
      • Provisions relevant to juvenile justice and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO)

    Grievance Mechanism

    • Each member must appoint a grievance officer, respond to grievances within 36 hours, and resolve complaints within one month.

    Training and Awareness Initiatives

    • Regular programs aimed at ensuring editorial staff are up-to-date with legal obligations and ethical considerations surrounding the reporting of sensitive issues.
    • Focus on the importance of communal harmony, factual verification, and avoidance of sensationalism in reporting.

    Conclusion

    The Code of Ethics formulated by the Digital News Publishers Association serves as a comprehensive framework ensuring responsible digital publishing, upholding constitutional rights, and maintaining ethical journalism standards across various digital platforms.

  • A publication concerning the operations and significance of the VRC was launched during the ceremony.
  • Judicial Perspectives:

    • CJI Surya Kant's Remarks:

      • Emphasized the need for justice to reach vulnerable populations without requiring them to navigate complex legal systems.
      • Highlighted that existing entitlements scattered across various statutes should be simplified for easy access by victims.
    • Justice V. Kameshwar Rao:

      • Recognized the VRC as a vital step in making justice more accessible for crime victims.
      • Urged that discussions on criminal justice should include the concerns of victims alongside state and accused perspectives.
    • Justice Sudhir Singh's Emphasis:

      • Stressed that success hinges on how sensitively individuals entering the justice system are treated, advocating that justice is meaningful only when it reaches those in dire need.

    Constitutional and Legal Framework:

    • Articles and Rights:
      • While specific constitutional articles were not mentioned in the text, the initiatives align with the principles of access to justice enshrined in the Indian Constitution, particularly under Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).

    Broader Impact and Goals:

    • The initiatives aim to ensure that justice and support mechanisms are not merely available but actively reach marginalized and vulnerable populations.
    • The success metrics for these initiatives will include real-time responses to victims, effective delivery of entitlements, and overall improvement in accessibility of the justice system.

    Conclusion:

    These initiatives represent a substantial shift towards making the justice system more inclusive and responsive to the needs of victims in Bihar, with an underlying principle that "justice must find its way to the citizen." The focus on outreach, awareness, and sensitivity could mark a significant improvement in the interaction between legal institutions and the communities they serve.