iAspirants
Current AffairsPrelims PYQsUPSC CSE SyllabusUPSC CSE StrategyBlogsPricing
Login
iAspirants

Your AI-powered companion for UPSC preparation.

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Current Affairs
  • Prelims PYQs
  • UPSC CSE Syllabus
  • UPSC CSE Strategy
  • Blogs

Company

  • Pricing
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Return Policy

© 2025 iAspirants, Inc. All rights reserved.

  1. Blogs
  2. International Relations

India's Role in BRICS' De-Dollarisation

Published on: 12-Sep-2026

Share this post

India's Role in BRICS' De-Dollarisation

Article Summary

Exam-Focused Notes on BRICS and De-Dollarisation

1. Context and Strategic Motivations

  • De-Dollarisation: The shift away from the U.S. dollar as a currency for international trade, payment settlements, and reserve currency.
  • Key Players: China and Russia seek to undermine U.S. financial dominance. Their motivation is strengthened by sanctions and conflict situations (e.g., Russia's invasion of Ukraine).

2. India’s Position

  • India, a net importer of crude oil (88% of needs), is heavily exposed to dollar fluctuations, influencing total import costs significantly.
  • The dollar's strong position can trigger capital flight from Indian equity markets due to adjustments in U.S. monetary policy.

3. Trade Dynamics

  • BRICS Currency Alternatives:
    • Proposals include local currency trade or a common currency to alleviate dollar demand.
    • Local currency trade can lead to heavy reliance on the renminbi due to trade surpluses.
  • Trade Deficits: India has a cumulative trade deficit of USD 226 billion with BRICS countries in FY26, causing imbalances.

4. Currency Mechanisms

  • Rupee-Ruble Trade Mechanism: Established but reveals issues surrounding the conversion and usability of rupee balances.
  • Common Currency Proposal: Requires a supranational authority similar to the Eurozone, which may conflict with national monetary sovereignty.

5. Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)

  • India advocates for CBDC to minimize transaction costs by enabling direct settlements between central banks.
  • CBDC structure allows for instant payment and settlement, bypassing multiple layers in traditional systems, such as SWIFT.
  • Challenges remain, as countries with trade surpluses may prefer not to hold e-rupee, favoring the renminbi instead.

6. Challenges to Implementation

  • Structural Challenges: Building a currency alternative faces hurdles such as liquidity and convertibility issues.
  • Renminbi Internationalization: BRICS currency initiatives may lead to an unintended increase in renminbi use as members trade primarily in that currency.

7. International Trade and Economic Concerns

  • Volume of Trade: A significant portion of the trade among BRICS countries may end up denominated in currencies favoring the Chinese yuan.
  • Risks include financial instability and exposure to global economic fluctuations tied to the U.S. dollar.

8. Conclusion

  • The push for de-dollarisation forms part of a broader effort among BRICS nations to increase economic resilience and reduce dependency on the U.S. dollar.
  • The complexities of implementing local currency trade or a BRICS currency underscore the challenges of global monetary reforms while balancing national interests.

Key Takeaways for Exams

  • Remember specific figures (like 88% crude import dependency).
  • Note the role of BRICS and key players (China, Russia, India) in the de-dollarisation discourse.
  • Understand implications of currency alternatives and the functionality of CBDC in trade.
  • Be aware of the trade deficit figures and how they impact currency discussions.

These notes encapsulate critical elements that are relevant for understanding the current trends and implications surrounding de-dollarisation and BRICS discussions.

Key Terms & Concepts

BRICS summitInternational meeting for cooperation
de-dollarisationSubstituting dollar in trade
RussiaKey player in de-dollarisation
ChinaDriving alternative currency discussions
crude oilMajor import impacting economy
88%Percentage of oil imports
$226 billionIndia's trade deficit with BRICS
rupee-ruble tradeMechanism for currency exchange
Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)Proposed digital payment solution
IMF’s SDRReference for currency basket model
SWIFTIntermediary in cross-border transactions

Mind Map for UPSC Civil Services Revision

Turn UPSC Civil Services Current Affairs Into Exam-Ready Notes

Reading International Relations current affairs is half the work. Revise them with ready-made notes and test what actually stuck.

  • Daily UPSC Civil Services current affairs analysis
  • Revision notes, mind maps & MCQs
  • Prelims mock tests with instant results

Related UPSC Civil Services Current Affairs Articles

BRICS Delhi Summit Key Outcomes
International Relations12-Sep-2026

BRICS Delhi Summit Key Outcomes

BRICS Delhi Summit Key Highlights

Date of Event: September 12-13, 2026

Participating Leaders:

  • Prime Ministers and Presidents from 32 countries, including:
    • Chinese President Xi Jinping
    • Russian President Vladimir Putin
    • Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi
  • Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto
  • Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian
  • UAE Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan
  • South African President Cyril Ramaphosa
  • Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud
  • Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed Ali
  • Background:

    • BRICS includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and expanded in 2024 to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Indonesia joined in 2025.

    Major Outcomes and Agreements:

    1. Condemnation of Terrorism:

      • BRICS countries agreed on unequivocal condemnation of terrorism in all forms and pledged to combat it collectively.
    2. Support for Global Governance Reform:

      • Consensus reached on the need to reform international institutions and enhance multilateralism, supporting India's bid for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
    3. Focus on the Global South:

      • BRICS aimed to be a stronger voice for the Global South, ensuring their perspectives are reflected in the global order.
    4. Development Cooperation:

      • Commitment to share developmental experiences with Global South nations.
    5. India’s Chairmanship:

      • India’s BRICS chairmanship emphasized a people-centric approach, with outcomes aimed at empowering various communities including women, farmers, and entrepreneurs.
    6. Positioning BRICS as a Dialogue Platform:

      • The summit promoted BRICS as a platform for constructive dialogue and cooperation among member states.
    7. Development-Oriented Frameworks:

      • Over 50 tangible outcomes planned, focusing on collaboration across four pillars: resilience, innovation, cooperation, and sustainability.
    8. Engagement Initiatives:

      • The summit was characterized as a “whole-of-nation effort” involving various sectors and institutions across 30 cities.
    9. Ongoing Participation:

      • Robust year-long participation illustrated India's ability to convene and build consensus with over 400 planned meetings across diverse sectors.
    10. Economic Representation:

    • BRICS represents approximately 49.5% of the world population, 40% of global GDP, and 26% of global trade.

    Additional Considerations:

    • Diplomatic Context: Ongoing discussions on language framing related to the West Asia conflict reflected divisions among member states, particularly Iran and UAE.
    • International Significance: The summit was indicative of BRICS's growing influence in global affairs as a coalition of emerging economies.

    Implications:

    • The outcomes and collective agreements reflect a shift towards more inclusive global governance, enhancing the role of emerging economies in international policymaking.
    • The focus on development and cooperation among member states suggests a long-term strategy for economic collaboration and humanitarian efforts within the Global South.

    The BRICS Delhi Summit sets a precedent for future engagements, reinforcing the alliance's intent to address pressing global issues collaboratively.

    BRICS Discuss Trade and Economic Governance
    International Relations12-Sep-2026

    BRICS Discuss Trade and Economic Governance

    Summary of BRICS Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (FMCBG) Joint Statement

    1. Concerns Over Trade Measures:

    • BRICS finance ministers emphasized concerns regarding the unilateral imposition of tariffs and non-tariff measures.
    • Such actions are viewed as trade distortions and inconsistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules.

    2. Background and Meetings:

    • Recent meetings took place in Jaipur (August 12-13) and Mumbai (September 10) under the theme of “Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability”.
    • The 18th BRICS Summit, hosted by India, will occur in New Delhi on September 12-13.

    3. Composition of BRICS:

    • BRICS comprises 11 nations: Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and UAE.

    4. Global Economic Outlook:

    • The FMCBG noted significant headwinds affecting the global economy, including:
      • Geopolitical tensions
      • Trade fragmentation and protectionism
      • Fiscal and inflationary pressures
      • Growing debt and financial vulnerabilities

    5. Reforms in Global Economic Governance:

    • Calls for reforms in Bretton Woods Institutions (IMF and World Bank) to enhance representation of emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs).
    • Emphasis on a merit-based, inclusive, and transparent selection process for leadership in these institutions.

    6. Quotas and Voting Shares:

    • Advocated for quota realignment reflecting countries’ positions in the global economy.
    • Proposed an increase in quotas and voting shares for EMDEs without adversely affecting developing countries.
    • Suggested the development of a transparent quota formula to safeguard the interests of poorer nations.

    7. Voluntary Financial Contributions:

    • Stressed that any voluntary financial contributions should not affect governance representation, quota allocation, and voting power in multilateral development institutions.

    8. Lima Principles:

    • Reaffirmation that BRICS should promote the increased voice and representation of developing countries through a shareholding realignment correcting their historical underrepresentation.

    Key Takeaways:

    • The collective statement underscores the need for global reforms to improve financial governance, ensure equity among nations in financial power, and address economic challenges facing EMDEs amid a complex global landscape.
    • The focus on sustainability, cooperation, and resilience reflects an ongoing evolution in international economic relationships and governance structures, particularly favoring emerging economies.

    These notes encapsulate critical points relevant for understanding the economic landscape and international relations influenced by the BRICS forum.

    Challenges Facing India at BRICS Summit
    International Relations12-Sep-2026

    Challenges Facing India at BRICS Summit

    BRICS Summit Overview

    Background:

    • BRICS Composition: Initially five nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) expanded in 2024 to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and UAE; Indonesia added in 2025.
    • Economic Influence: BRICS represents half of the global population, accounts for two-fifths of the global economy, and constitutes a fourth of global trade.

    Geopolitical Context:

    • Global Conflicts: Increased tensions among members, particularly regarding the US-Israel-Iran situation, complicating consensus within BRICS.
    • US Position: Former President Donald Trump's administration's threat of tariffs due to alleged attempts to decrease US dollar dominance disrupts relations with BRICS.

    India's Role:

    • Hosting the BRICS Summit in Delhi, India seeks to navigate these geopolitical complexities, enhancing its global stature amidst conflicting interests.

    Economic Data:

    • Intra-BRICS Trade: The grouping has enhanced intra-BRICS economic cooperation, contrary to the perceived anti-Western stance often associated with BRICS.

    Diplomatic Efforts:

    • The Modi government aims to balance ties with the US while enhancing India’s diplomatic prominence through its BRICS presidency.
    • Successful negotiations during the summit would mark a significant diplomatic achievement for India amidst global tensions.

    International Relations:

    • BRICS serves as a counterbalance to Western alliances such as the G-7, providing India with leverage in international negotiations and policies.

    Conclusion:

    This summit emphasizes India's role on the global stage and the complexities of managing a diverse coalition of emerging economies amid significant geopolitical challenges.

    BRICS Summit Highlights Economic Data
    International Relations11-Sep-2026

    BRICS Summit Highlights Economic Data

    18th BRICS Summit Overview

    • Event Date: September 12-13, 2026
    • Location: New Delhi, India
    • Members: 11 countries - Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, UAE.
    • Origin of BRICS: Formed from BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) in 2006; South Africa joined in 2010.
    • Purpose: To address the concerns of emerging economies and counterbalance developed nations (e.g., G7).

    Economic Data Highlights

    • China's GDP vs. BRICS:

      • 2006: China's GDP was less than the combined GDP of the other four BRIC nations.
      • Post-2009: China's GDP outpaced the combined GDP of India, Brazil, and Russia.
      • 2026: China's GDP is now more than double that of the other four BRICS countries combined.
    • GDP Trajectories:

      • India overtook Brazil and Russia to become the second-largest economy in BRICS by 2015.
      • As of 2026, China has exhibited significant economic growth compared to the G7 nations, except the US.
    • Per Capita Prosperity:

      • In 2006, the average citizen from Russia, Brazil, or South Africa was 3-3.5 times richer than a Chinese citizen.
      • By 2026, average Chinese income exceeds that of Brazilians and is twice that of South Africans; the disparity with Russians and Indians has narrowed, with Chinese five times richer than Indians.

    Implications and Analysis

    • China's Dominance:
      • The rapid economic rise of China has transformed its position from an emerging market to a dominant global economic force.
      • The growing gap raises questions about the influence China may have in BRICS discussions and decision-making processes.

    Conclusion

    • The 18th BRICS Summit marks 20 years of the group, with China positioned as an economic powerhouse, overshadowing other member nations. The summit's outcomes will be crucial for the future alignment and influence of emerging economies on global platforms.
    India-US Military Exercise Yudh Abhyas 2026
    National and International Importance11-Sep-2026

    India-US Military Exercise Yudh Abhyas 2026

    Summary of India-U.S. Military Exercise: Yudh Abhyas 2026

    • Event: 22nd edition of the annual bilateral military exercise Yudh Abhyas.

    • Timeline: Conducted from September 9 to 28, 2026.

    • Focus Areas:

      • High-altitude warfare.
      • Long-range precision fires.
      • Counter-drone capabilities.
      • Increased operational interoperability.
    • Forces Involved:

      • Deployment of Arctic-trained soldiers from the U.S. Army’s 11th Airborne Division (based at Fort Wainwright, Alaska).
      • Participation of the U.S. Army’s 3rd Multi-Domain Task Force (3MDTF).
    • Exercise Components:

      • Command post exercise.
      • Field training exercise.
      • Combined live-fire demonstration involving long-range precision fires and rocket systems from both nations.
    UN Adopts New World Map Design
    National and International Importance11-Sep-2026

    UN Adopts New World Map Design

    UN Resolution on Global Mapping

    • Resolution Details: The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to move away from the Mercator map projection to the 2018 Equal Earth projection, aiming for a more accurate representation of Earth's geography, particularly Africa.
    • Voting Outcome: 164 countries voted in favor, with the United States opposing and six countries abstaining. The resolution is non-binding.
    • Historical Context: The Mercator projection, introduced in 1569, has been the standard for navigation but has been criticized for distorting the size of landmasses, particularly those closer to the poles.

    Technical Aspects of Mapping

    • Understanding Projections: Different types of map projections include:
      • Conformal Projections: Preserve angles (e.g., Mercator).
      • Equal-Area Projections: Maintain area proportions (e.g., Equal Earth).
      • Equidistant Projections: Maintain distance.
      • Compromise Projections: Balance various distortions.
    India's Diplomatic Challenge with Bangladesh
    International Relations10-Sep-2026

    India's Diplomatic Challenge with Bangladesh

    Exam-Focused Notes

    International Relations

    • Extradition Demand: Bangladesh is requesting the extradition of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to face charges related to a student uprising.
    • India's Dilemma: India must maintain a balance between its historical ties with Sheikh Hasina and its current relationship with the Bangladeshi government.
    • Proposed Solution: A legal-diplomatic approach is suggested, involving:
      • Examination of the extradition request under the existing extradition treaty.
      • Assurance of a fair trial and protection against political persecution.
      • Continuous dialogue to maintain credibility and bilateral relations.

    BRICS Participation

    • Participation of Bangladesh in the BRICS summit is considered beneficial for its international standing, emphasizing the need to set aside sensitive issues like Sheikh Hasina's extradition for broader bilateral and multilateral relations.

    Conflicts and Peace Initiatives

    • Russia-Ukraine Conflict: India is exploring ways to aid in ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has caused significant humanitarian and economic crises, raising concerns about the recruitment of Indian nationals into military service.
    • Call for Accountability: There is pressure on the Indian government to address the situation of Indian nationals reportedly coerced into military service during the conflict.

    Historical Context

    • The principles of the French Revolution (liberty, equality, fraternity) were brought into focus concerning contemporary issues related to gender discrimination highlighted by a recent protest at the Eiffel Tower regarding women's visibility and representation in the workplace.

    Summary of Key Constitutional and Policy Aspects

    • India-Bangladesh Relations: The importance of diplomatic efforts rooted in mutual national interests and civilizational ties.
    • Extradition Treaty Matrix: The need for legal frameworks supporting extradition requests, highlighting the importance of due process and human rights considerations.

    Economic Indicators and Social Issues

    • Humanitarian Impact: The ongoing war has led to loss of life, and significant community safety issues for Indian contractors in conflict zones.
    • The need to assess foreign policies against international humanitarian norms.

    Recommendations for Government Action

    • Strengthened Diplomatic Conversations: Engage both Bangladesh and involved parties in open discussions to reaffirm commitments to national integrity while addressing sensitive historical grievances.
    • Support for Affected Nationals: Implement protective measures for Indian nationals employed abroad to avoid exploitation in foreign military conflicts.

    These notes encapsulate critical elements regarding international law, diplomatic relations, and evolving foreign policy stances that could be relevant in scholarly discussions or examination contexts.

  • New Technological Integration:

    • Advanced counter-drone capabilities deployed for the first time, specifically the U.S. Army’s Mobile Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aircraft Integrated Defeat System (MLIDS) to counter aerial threats.
  • Strategic Framework:

    • Conducted under the larger strategic framework of Operation Pathways aimed at strengthening interoperability, information sharing, and operational readiness.
  • Dignitaries Present:

    • U.S. Ambassador to India Sergio Gor.
    • Lieutenant General Joel “JB” Vowell, Deputy Commanding General of the U.S. Army Pacific.
  • Context:

    • Rising defense cooperation between India and the United States.
    • Emphasis on multi-domain operations, unmanned systems, precision fire capabilities, and high-altitude combat readiness.
  • This exercise reflects the increasing collaboration in defense between India and the U.S., reinforcing strategic ties through joint military training and capability enhancements to address evolving security challenges.

  • Distortions in Mapping: All flat maps distort at least one property (area, shape, distance, direction) due to the Earth's spheroid shape.
  • Implications of the Mercator Projection

    • Colonial Legacy: The Mercator projection is criticized for perpetuating Western-centric views, contributing to colonial narratives regarding the Global South.
    • Impact on Representation: It inflates the size of landmasses such as Greenland and Antarctica while diminishing the perceived scale of developing regions, including South Asia.

    Alternatives and Comparisons

    • Other Projects: Historical attempts at better projections include:
      • Gall Projection (1855): introduced a new view but faced criticism.
      • Peters Projection (1973): maintained area accuracy but distorted shapes.
      • Robinson Projection (1963) and Winkel Tripel Projection (1921): aimed to reduce distortion across several properties.
    • Equal Earth Map (2018):
      • Characteristics: An equal-area projection that better represents landmass sizes, maintaining visual balance.
      • Usage: Advocated for thematic data representation, useful in educational settings and resource distribution analyses.

    Current Trends

    • Shift in Usage: The World Bank is phasing out Mercator for online maps and adopting the Winkel Tripel or Equal Earth projections. Google Maps allows users to choose between the Mercator projection and 3D views, with the latter remaining the default on mobile apps.

    Expert Notes

    • Siva Kumar Rachapudi: Emphasizes the importance of accurate area depiction in understanding population density and resource allocation across regions.
    • Controversy: Experts express varied opinions about the effectiveness of the Equal Earth map compared to other projections, but all agree on the need for a balanced representation in teaching and research contexts.

    This resolution and the shift in mapping practices signify a broader recognition of the need for equitable visual representation of global geography, especially regarding historically marginalized regions.